It looks like you're using an ad blocker! I really need the income to keep this site running.
If you enjoy BlenderNation and you think it’s a valuable resource to the Blender community, please take a moment to read how you can support BlenderNation.

Blender 2.79: Render With GPU and CPU in Blender (+ Benchmarks)


Ronnie Neeley writes:

I made this video a few weeks ago, but have still yet to see many other people talking about it, so felt it was useful to share again.

GPU + CPU rendering has drastically decreased my render times, and chances are it will do the same for you too!

Viewers were kind enough to share benchmarks. It seems that one needs a mid range to high end CPU to truly benefit from this, but it doesn't hurt to try!

About Author

Ronnie Neeley

3D Generalist, Tutorial Maker, and Cool Dude from Illinois, USA.


  1. Thanks for this.
    So I guess the max memory usable is limited to the GPU's?
    I can't really try that feature as I am in production right now and can't change my version of Blender but can you elaborate on the discrepancy in rendering that you mentioned? I sometimes have 2 versions of Blender rendering the same animation, one with CPU one with GPU and I have never seen any difference between the renders. Would be interesting to know if some people have and is it in a specific type of renders (glass, fluids?)

  2. Render hızı PC'ye göre değişiyor. Bende CPU seçiliyken daha hızlı render alıyor. GPU daha yavaş. Benim laptopun ekran kartı eski. CPU 8 çekirdekli daha hızlı.
    ( İngilizcem çok kötü :) )

    • Render speed varies by PC. I get faster rendering when CPU is selected. The GPU is slower. My laptop's video card is old. CPU 8-core faster.
      (English is very bad :))

  3. 3x970 + 1x1060, 3770k, BMW scene:
    - GPU, 240x180 - 0:46
    - CPU+GPU, 240x180 - 6:36
    - CPU+GPU, 64x64 - 1:09
    - CPU+GPU, 32x32 - 0:50
    - CPU+GPU, 16x16 - 0:42
    - CPU+GPU, 12z12 - 0:43
    - CPU+GPU, 8x8 - 0:44

    Get the Threadripper and be happy.

  4. In a few tests I've done so far, I've found the new feature to be slightly slower than rendering with my GPU. But what I also found was that render times were drastically cut in the daily build compared to 2.79 stable.

    It seems Cycles will hopefully get a lot faster in the future :)

  5. I am amazed that it has taken this long for someone to get around to coding CPU + GPU rendering. I thought that it was a no-brainer.

  6. I have a 6 core x2 thread i7 and 2G GTX 960. I'm getting a 30-40% improvement from this feature. Best render times with 64*64 or 128*128 tiles. Great to look forward to, but I'm going to stick to the stable release for now.

  7. i did my compare:
    OSX 10.11.6
    GPU - AMD FirePro D700 6144 MB (openCL)
    CPU - 2,7 GHz 12-Core Intel Xeon E5
    Blender 2.79.1

    Cycles render - 2500AA

    CPU - titles 32 - 08:14 min
    2xGPU - titles 240/218 - 15:53 min
    2xGPU + CPU - titles 240/218 - 07:08 min
    2xGPU + CPU - titles 120/108 - 06:22 min

    OSX 10.12 (beta)
    GPU - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 3072 MB (CUDA)
    CPU - 2x 2,66 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
    Blender 2.79.1

    Cycles render - 2500AA

    CPU - titles 32 - 11:18 min
    GPU - titles 240/218 - 05:04 min
    GPU + CPU - titles 240/218 - 10:05 min
    GPU + CPU - titles 120/108 - 05:29 min

    A better Cuda card does not have better results. For users with a worse card and a good processor, it makes sense.
    my compare here

    • edit:
      i did compare GPU+CPU with titles 64x64
      COMPARE 1 7:06 min ---- slower
      COMPARE 2 4:45 min ---- faster
      Result: YES, its faster, than GPU only, BUT don't use Auto title size, find your title size.

Leave A Reply

To add a profile picture to your message, register your email address with To protect your email address, create an account on BlenderNation and log in when posting a message.