It looks like you're using an ad blocker! I really need the income to keep this site running.
If you enjoy BlenderNation and you think it’s a valuable resource to the Blender community, please take a moment to read how you can support BlenderNation.

Benchmarking "Disney" Principled BSDF

3

BlackhartFilms takes a hard look at the new 'Principled BSDF' PBR shader node that will be included in Blender 2.79.

2.79 is shaping up to be an exciting update, including proper Shadow Catchers, Persistent Data to massively speed up animation renders, but arguably most exciting is the new Principled BSDF shader, based on Disneys Pixar BRDF model. Finally, a proper PBR universal shader built directly into Blender! So I spent a full day testing it against a PBR Uber-Shader in a variety of scenes to come to some rough conclusions.

About Author

My name is Jeffrey Hepburn- I’m a filmmaker, graphic designer, 3D Artist, and programmer. I’m a Microsoft Certified Professional & Technology Associate, certified in Photoshop and Premiere Pro, and proficient in After Effects, Blender 3D, Allegorithmic’s Substance Live, Audition, and Illustrator. I’ve been working with Blender for over 6 years, and I specialise in hard-surface modelling, PBR texturing, and the Cycles node editor.

3 Comments

  1. Thanks for a very interesting write-up. Disregarding all the technical details, in the side by side renders I thought that the Principled BSDF renders seemed to have better dynamic range than the Uber renders, which all tend to have a slightly washed-out pastel look. Having said that, I expect a touch of contrast boost would give the Uber renders the same level of 'pop'.

    • I suspect this is because of the light-wrapping and the fact I was using Filmic Blender. AFAIK Filmic stretches the dynamic range such that the absolute brightest point in your image and the absolute darkest are mapped out in a Filmic Log style, and then applying the Base Contrast LUT will attempt to correct it back down to a less washed out version. I mentioned in the write-up that the new shader seemed to be consistently brighter likely because of the light-wrapping it was exhibiting, which means Filmic Blender would be giving it more perceived contrast despite the same exact light setups being used.

  2. Simon Storl-Schulke on

    Did you use Multiscatter GGX or GGX? Multiscatter GGX is a bit slower for me and produces more fireflies, but also seems to be more accurate and solves the darkening problem when using high Roughness values. The comparison you did was very intereresting and I aggree on the most points (Emission Input, IOR..) - but in my eyes the brighter Fresnel Reflections that the Principled BSDF produces actuallylook better and more realistic then the ones in your Ubershader. In Disney's original paper (very nice read btw), it says

    "....This corresponds to ior values in the range [1.0, 1.8], encompassing most common
    materials. Notably, the middle of the parameter range corresponds to an ior of 1.5, a very typical
    value, and is also our default."

    I think this is a very good range that should work for all materials - but yeah IOR might still be usefull if you wan't to go ultra realistic.

Leave A Reply

To add a profile picture to your message, register your email address with Gravatar.com. To protect your email address, create an account on BlenderNation and log in when posting a message.