SceneCity 1.0 adds procedural buildings
In addition to using a library of static building models, SceneCity can now procedurally generate your buildings.
Arnaud Couturier writes:Hello city lovers!
SceneCity 1.0 has just been released, with a major new feature: procedural buildings!
Some of you have been following my work on this project for several years (and will for the years to come I hope), and might remember this kind of buildings from the beginning. They are now back, much improved and well integrated! They will be expanded with new algorithms in future updates. They’re fun to play with, so have a look!
For the complete release log, you can check it here.
There is a discount for new and existing users!
http://cgchan.com/store/scenecityPS to Bart:
I’ll be glad to make a contribution to BlenderNation via Paypal :)
Link
- SceneCity 1.0 – $79.95 (with 30% discount until April 24: $55.95)
… Looks like it’s still locked to 90 degree street intersections and no elevation changes, though…
Yes, locked to 90° street intersections. Arbitrary street angles will be added in a later version. Elevation change is possible over a terrain, but nothing can be built on slopes.
Hi I was told by @blendernation over on Twitter to leave this as a reply / question on the blog.
Can this take data from google maps and import it ? I’d like to make a 3d copy of my city.
There was something similar a few years back that could but I think that project has been abandoned.
~MorpheusArch
Hello Mark,
no, SceneCity cannot take data from GoogleMaps. I thought it isn’t possible to extract raw data from GoogleMaps… I’d like to know how to do it, so I can implement this feature! My research on this topic gave nothing…
Cheers :)
Arnaud
You might have more luck with Open Street Maps? Although their data is probably not as complete as Google’s.
Here’s an article on OSM I wrote some time ago, maybe it’s helpful:
https://blog.sketchfab.com/creating-interactive-3d-maps-with-openstreetmap-and-sketchfab/
Yes that’s what I thought about GoogleMaps…
Thank you Bart, I’ll have a good look at your article :)