Blender3DArchitect shares some amazing work by Stanislav Pyadishev.
Alan Britto writes:
In architectural visualization we often get little time to produce great renders, and despite the short deadline, most artists usually find a way to get the job done. But, how many of us would find time to finish a project and work on a bonus image for a client? Apparently Stanislav Pyadishev a.k.a suomi found a way to finish an incredible exterior image and render an interior view of a project as a bonus.
Link
12 Comments
Pfft. Blender people. Always trying to pass photos off as something they rendered.
Yeah, happens all the time. Just like they said Tears of Steel was cg but it really wasn't.
That was just a documentary of life in Amsterdam.
hehe. yeah i see what you mean. TOS was just life in amsterdam with our robo-pets :)
great arch viz! Wish there was link to the hi-res image here so that we don't have to go via two links to see it in hi-res at the yafaray-forum
With what can be done these days using CG I would not be so quick to tag an image as a photo. Photo realism is quite easily done with applications like Blender.
(Should we tell him?) ;o)
Hmmm. At least my comment above was clearly a sarcastic compliment. This I am not so sure... How many renders do you think would actually trick anyone experienced in 3d? None I would think. At least not yet.
I think quite many renders looks convincingly real. I just don't know which ones ;)
Consider the opposite frame of reference. I once saw a photo that was so flat and uninteresting that I actually thought for a moment that it looked like a Blender Internal render. Perfectly flat and boring sky, very little shading elsewhere, etc.
(forgot to subscribe)
we are used to see retouched photos, adertising photos and quite different photos made with phone, camera, fridge and so on. i think we could be easily tricked if our visualisations wouldn't try to be "perfect"
I haven't wrote that i really adore those:)