<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Render Speed Comparison (2.49b VS 2.5)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/</link>
	<description>Fresh Blender News, Every Day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:55:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob2</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-500231</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=10170#comment-500231</guid>
		<description>I tried it and my render time came down by more than half, which was great. What was not so great was seeing all you guys measuring your times in seconds when I&#039;m still in multiple minutes on a 3GHz Pentium 4 (wipes a tear from the eye), still, I love my machine and 5m35s down to 2m30s is quite an improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried it and my render time came down by more than half, which was great. What was not so great was seeing all you guys measuring your times in seconds when I&#8217;m still in multiple minutes on a 3GHz Pentium 4 (wipes a tear from the eye), still, I love my machine and 5m35s down to 2m30s is quite an improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deyon</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-500207</link>
		<dc:creator>deyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=10170#comment-500207</guid>
		<description>i dont care much for speed. just give me a good quality render.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont care much for speed. just give me a good quality render.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterlove Jesus</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-500199</link>
		<dc:creator>peterlove Jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=10170#comment-500199</guid>
		<description>I notice a thing in rendering a mirrored and transparented object with ray tracing enabled in rendering setting i see to say it to all , if it realy true , 
after rendering an animation , try to change the octree value in rendering settings , some times rendering faster when choosing higher value and sometimes faster when choosing lowest value . so i suggest when rendering try and press scape to try another value of octree to see your choice which will be faster , God bless all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice a thing in rendering a mirrored and transparented object with ray tracing enabled in rendering setting i see to say it to all , if it realy true ,<br />
after rendering an animation , try to change the octree value in rendering settings , some times rendering faster when choosing higher value and sometimes faster when choosing lowest value . so i suggest when rendering try and press scape to try another value of octree to see your choice which will be faster , God bless all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: konrad_ha</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-500192</link>
		<dc:creator>konrad_ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=10170#comment-500192</guid>
		<description>Reading this I finally got a custom build from http://www.graphicall.org/builds and man, should I have done that earlier! Not only does the optimized version for my CPU render about 30% faster, it also comes with a great custom theme, a plethora of useful scripts, a material library and tons of other features. Using custom builds is the way to go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this I finally got a custom build from <a href="http://www.graphicall.org/builds" rel="nofollow">http://www.graphicall.org/builds</a> and man, should I have done that earlier! Not only does the optimized version for my CPU render about 30% faster, it also comes with a great custom theme, a plethora of useful scripts, a material library and tons of other features. Using custom builds is the way to go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim, LA</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-500168</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim, LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=10170#comment-500168</guid>
		<description>@Lokimonster:
OKOK!! But with 8 tiles I get 10,13 seconds! What do you say now!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lokimonster:<br />
OKOK!! But with 8 tiles I get 10,13 seconds! What do you say now!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim, LA</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-500165</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim, LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=10170#comment-500165</guid>
		<description>Yes, a littel bit faster!
15,9 s with 2.49b and with 2.5 it&#039;s 12,04 s!! (both 8 threads!)
But I am waiting for the finished 2.5 with GI and particle-rendering!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a littel bit faster!<br />
15,9 s with 2.49b and with 2.5 it&#8217;s 12,04 s!! (both 8 threads!)<br />
But I am waiting for the finished 2.5 with GI and particle-rendering!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akta</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-500154</link>
		<dc:creator>Akta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=10170#comment-500154</guid>
		<description>Unbelievable, I was sceptic about that and yesterday I tried for the first time the version 2.5
Another level guys, I love it and it&#039;s a lot easier to learn than every other Blender version ever, rendering was 3 times faster with my scene (41.25 seconds with 2.5, 2 mins and 20 secs with 2.49b on a Mac Pro dual quad-core)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbelievable, I was sceptic about that and yesterday I tried for the first time the version 2.5<br />
Another level guys, I love it and it&#8217;s a lot easier to learn than every other Blender version ever, rendering was 3 times faster with my scene (41.25 seconds with 2.5, 2 mins and 20 secs with 2.49b on a Mac Pro dual quad-core)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banor</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-500139</link>
		<dc:creator>banor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=10170#comment-500139</guid>
		<description>wow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Blank</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-500133</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Blank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=10170#comment-500133</guid>
		<description>YES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saverio</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/render-speed-comparison-2-49b-vs-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-500130</link>
		<dc:creator>saverio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=10170#comment-500130</guid>
		<description>done! :) from 34.98 seconds to 24.84 with sse3 and 3 threads, the sculpting is more faster too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>done! :) from 34.98 seconds to 24.84 with sse3 and 3 threads, the sculpting is more faster too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
