<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professional Work for Colt Firearms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/</link>
	<description>Fresh Blender News, Every Day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:00:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blendedarmyfrog</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/comment-page-2/#comment-481472</link>
		<dc:creator>blendedarmyfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=7416#comment-481472</guid>
		<description>@ Roth:
Nice work on the materials. I&#039;m looking at an M4 carbine and an M16A2 right now and the glare from the lighting is pretty accurate. I would suggest that in the future a little more attention is paid to how the spent round gets extracted, just so it doesn&#039;t take away from your work when/if someone notices. As far as the goal of demonstrating the main differences between the military AR series rifles and essentially animating the evolution of the AR rifle from what it started out as; well done. 

@ The gun debate:
Really? What about a job that demonstrates, piece by piece how an IED on the side of the road might be the last thing someone sees? It&#039;s all in what the intentions are. Colt produces a lot of military and civilian weapons. From what the animation shows, it looked to be directed more to the military&#039;s tactical side. Would the comments still have gone in this direction if it was demonstrating some bows and arrows? Crossbows? Same concept, right? People have hobbies that range from target shooting to hunting with both. It&#039;s meant as a demonstration for Colt and shared with us in hopes of helping or could have been to let people know that Blender&#039;s name is growing. I don&#039;t know, anyone want to ask Tim? 

Honestly, I see a lot of good that CAN come from this project and I hope that in the future we all can put our personal feelings out of the way, just to look at the work. If the video went more in depth it could potentially become a training aid for small arms repair personnel or an animated (dis)assembly guide covering multiple models. Maybe, just maybe, a larger company would be more open to the idea of supporting Blender in some way if they saw a real chance of it helping them. Wouldn&#039;t it be great if Blender could get more donations and support to enable it to become the replacement for the software they&#039;re currently using? They might write their own scripts to adapt to what they need, but it seems like it would start to look like the difference between some open source office software or operating systems and their &#039;pay&#039; counterparts, only the benefit would be much greater on the open source side. I think it&#039;s wonderful to see more and more professional work done for larger businesses. Not everyone knows how or has the time to learn to work with Blender. If it&#039;s that knowledge and creative ability that helps someone put food on the table...what could be better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Roth:<br />
Nice work on the materials. I&#8217;m looking at an M4 carbine and an M16A2 right now and the glare from the lighting is pretty accurate. I would suggest that in the future a little more attention is paid to how the spent round gets extracted, just so it doesn&#8217;t take away from your work when/if someone notices. As far as the goal of demonstrating the main differences between the military AR series rifles and essentially animating the evolution of the AR rifle from what it started out as; well done. </p>
<p>@ The gun debate:<br />
Really? What about a job that demonstrates, piece by piece how an IED on the side of the road might be the last thing someone sees? It&#8217;s all in what the intentions are. Colt produces a lot of military and civilian weapons. From what the animation shows, it looked to be directed more to the military&#8217;s tactical side. Would the comments still have gone in this direction if it was demonstrating some bows and arrows? Crossbows? Same concept, right? People have hobbies that range from target shooting to hunting with both. It&#8217;s meant as a demonstration for Colt and shared with us in hopes of helping or could have been to let people know that Blender&#8217;s name is growing. I don&#8217;t know, anyone want to ask Tim? </p>
<p>Honestly, I see a lot of good that CAN come from this project and I hope that in the future we all can put our personal feelings out of the way, just to look at the work. If the video went more in depth it could potentially become a training aid for small arms repair personnel or an animated (dis)assembly guide covering multiple models. Maybe, just maybe, a larger company would be more open to the idea of supporting Blender in some way if they saw a real chance of it helping them. Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if Blender could get more donations and support to enable it to become the replacement for the software they&#8217;re currently using? They might write their own scripts to adapt to what they need, but it seems like it would start to look like the difference between some open source office software or operating systems and their &#8216;pay&#8217; counterparts, only the benefit would be much greater on the open source side. I think it&#8217;s wonderful to see more and more professional work done for larger businesses. Not everyone knows how or has the time to learn to work with Blender. If it&#8217;s that knowledge and creative ability that helps someone put food on the table&#8230;what could be better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francisco Ortiz</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/comment-page-2/#comment-481409</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco Ortiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=7416#comment-481409</guid>
		<description>Absulutely agree with HTS and many others, Raimon, Skadge... 
I think it`s sad to see Blender helping Colt professionally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absulutely agree with HTS and many others, Raimon, Skadge&#8230;<br />
I think it`s sad to see Blender helping Colt professionally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickpier</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/comment-page-2/#comment-481238</link>
		<dc:creator>rickpier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=7416#comment-481238</guid>
		<description>Beuuuuuurkkkkk!!! 
Ok ok  some effects are nice...but I see a job that promote weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beuuuuuurkkkkk!!!<br />
Ok ok  some effects are nice&#8230;but I see a job that promote weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charon</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/comment-page-2/#comment-481202</link>
		<dc:creator>charon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=7416#comment-481202</guid>
		<description>Not my cup of tea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not my cup of tea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOGAN</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/comment-page-2/#comment-481194</link>
		<dc:creator>LOGAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=7416#comment-481194</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s okay for reactions to animations also cover some other points that the plain technical things once in a while. People do have opinions and while I understand the reason of wanting to keep an discussion &#039;on topic&#039; I think it&#039;s wrong to deny people they freedom to have an opinion and express it. It reminds me of an earlier discussion where people reacted negative about something and eventually the discussion got locked. That to me sounds like discussion is okay unless the reactions seem to be undesirable.

If people can&#039;t express their feelings, and may not have criticism, what is an discussion really worth anyway.

It&#039;s still a good 3D model and animation though!

Nothing to see here, move along, move along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s okay for reactions to animations also cover some other points that the plain technical things once in a while. People do have opinions and while I understand the reason of wanting to keep an discussion &#8216;on topic&#8217; I think it&#8217;s wrong to deny people they freedom to have an opinion and express it. It reminds me of an earlier discussion where people reacted negative about something and eventually the discussion got locked. That to me sounds like discussion is okay unless the reactions seem to be undesirable.</p>
<p>If people can&#8217;t express their feelings, and may not have criticism, what is an discussion really worth anyway.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a good 3D model and animation though!</p>
<p>Nothing to see here, move along, move along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aristocrata</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/comment-page-2/#comment-481146</link>
		<dc:creator>Aristocrata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=7416#comment-481146</guid>
		<description>Very beautiful animation. I love Blender and weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very beautiful animation. I love Blender and weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nXain</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/comment-page-2/#comment-481095</link>
		<dc:creator>nXain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=7416#comment-481095</guid>
		<description>Many people on this forum seem to think this work is aimed at the consumer (despite the artist saying it was for specifically for a trade show).  

A trade show that Colt would have a booth at is aimed at police, paramilitary and minor military organizations (I have been to several of these).  For the record, you can&#039;t simply go buy this type of weapon in the U.S. except for the modified, semi-auto automatic AR15 (and you don&#039;t find those sitting on store shelves).

In last trade show I went to dealing with small arms, pretty much the whole world was well-represented, especially European and Eastern European arms manufacturers.  HK probably had the largest presence.  Pretending like there is something special about Colt or this particular piece of work is nothing more than anti-Americanism and very ignorant of the environment in which it is used (or the arms industry for that matter).

I think that many of you that are negative of the content should step back and really think about the context and the market for which it is intended.  You should also ask yourself what open source actually means, as you&#039;re going to be very unhappy with what many users are doing with Blender, especially those who are actually using it for work rather than hobby related content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people on this forum seem to think this work is aimed at the consumer (despite the artist saying it was for specifically for a trade show).  </p>
<p>A trade show that Colt would have a booth at is aimed at police, paramilitary and minor military organizations (I have been to several of these).  For the record, you can&#8217;t simply go buy this type of weapon in the U.S. except for the modified, semi-auto automatic AR15 (and you don&#8217;t find those sitting on store shelves).</p>
<p>In last trade show I went to dealing with small arms, pretty much the whole world was well-represented, especially European and Eastern European arms manufacturers.  HK probably had the largest presence.  Pretending like there is something special about Colt or this particular piece of work is nothing more than anti-Americanism and very ignorant of the environment in which it is used (or the arms industry for that matter).</p>
<p>I think that many of you that are negative of the content should step back and really think about the context and the market for which it is intended.  You should also ask yourself what open source actually means, as you&#8217;re going to be very unhappy with what many users are doing with Blender, especially those who are actually using it for work rather than hobby related content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/comment-page-2/#comment-481094</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=7416#comment-481094</guid>
		<description>When I saw that modeling I was shocked, amazed, how on earth did he do it that good??! Then I saw it was provided by Colt. Oh well. Aside from the Blue background of Death, it looked fine to me. I assume this would be used for some sort of presentation on the parts of the Colt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw that modeling I was shocked, amazed, how on earth did he do it that good??! Then I saw it was provided by Colt. Oh well. Aside from the Blue background of Death, it looked fine to me. I assume this would be used for some sort of presentation on the parts of the Colt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dagobert</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/comment-page-2/#comment-481066</link>
		<dc:creator>dagobert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=7416#comment-481066</guid>
		<description>In france people cant buy this kind of arms. And i think that no one exept professional should be able to buy some. But i agree that this is not the point. So for the crits. Imo the bacground is not the good choice. not enought contrast. the modeling is good. But the animation is not very good. it would be better with ease in ease out. or at least i suppose that some part need to be put in place quickly, but some other slowly. so just rythm trouble.
Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In france people cant buy this kind of arms. And i think that no one exept professional should be able to buy some. But i agree that this is not the point. So for the crits. Imo the bacground is not the good choice. not enought contrast. the modeling is good. But the animation is not very good. it would be better with ease in ease out. or at least i suppose that some part need to be put in place quickly, but some other slowly. so just rythm trouble.<br />
Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidC</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/professional-work-for-colt-firearms/comment-page-2/#comment-481062</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=7416#comment-481062</guid>
		<description>Well, apparently it&#039;s back up already.  It take it it&#039;s showing the various modifications that can be made to the fire arm? BTW, how did you animate the casing ejection? Looks good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, apparently it&#8217;s back up already.  It take it it&#8217;s showing the various modifications that can be made to the fire arm? BTW, how did you animate the casing ejection? Looks good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
