Comments on: Indigo Renderer v1.0 Released

By: DramaKing

DramaKing — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:46:31 +0000

Wow, they have a linux build. That's probably the best thing about it.

By: Edward

Edward — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:05:45 +0000

Finally, a Linux version. Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Bmud

Bmud — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:15:57 +0000

Hmmm…. The documentation looks rather good. Maybe I'll give it a spin. I do miss Brazil r/s and this would give me fisheye cameras again. :D

By: roofoo

roofoo — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:25:53 +0000

The site is UP… :)

By: roofoo

roofoo — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:06:24 +0000

The site is down… :(

By: MarcoA

MarcoA — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:15:21 +0000

Good!
Well, I was using v1.0.5.2 (on WinXP and Debian GNU/Linux via wine), named "unstable", but I never had problems with it!

By: Imagens Para Arquitetura

Imagens Para Arquitetura — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:45:48 +0000

thanks for share this, i was waiting for this release

By: DilScallion

DilScallion — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:30:44 +0000

I see that Indigo supports network rendering right out of the box. Its a shame that Yafray doesn't have the same feature…

By: Wishmaster

Wishmaster — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:47:34 +0000

Indigo isn't supposed to be fast, it's supposed to be physically accurate. There's no such thing as a lighting setup in Indigo, you just insert the lights as they physically are in the scene, and it will render a beautiful picture. Actually, Indigo's about the closest thing there is to having a "Automatic Render Pretty Picture" button.

By: TimeIsMoney

TimeIsMoney — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:25:31 +0000

"Producing a reasonably noise free render of a simple scene at 800×600px with a 1gb,3gz Pentium might take say 12-24 hrs depending on the materials."

Cripes! I think I'll stick with Blender's internal renderer for the time being.