<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blender in Amateur Movie “Ideality”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Fresh Blender News, Every Day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:06:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Hubert</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-52106</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Hubert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/2007/01/30/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/#comment-52106</guid>
		<description>Bmud, sounds good to me. Use whatever you can find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bmud, sounds good to me. Use whatever you can find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-48403</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 07:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/2007/01/30/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/#comment-48403</guid>
		<description>Hi Ian,

that&#039;s a wicked demoreel you&#039;ve got there!

Bart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian,</p>
<p>that&#039;s a wicked demoreel you&#039;ve got there!</p>
<p>Bart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bmud</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-48147</link>
		<dc:creator>Bmud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/2007/01/30/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/#comment-48147</guid>
		<description>Hiya Ian. I really like your stuff. I would love to put something into my spring film fest (it doesn&#039;t make any money). Ideality is unfortunately too long and SBFP though in 15 minute intervals is a three parter so that&#039;s too long too. I&#039;ll check out some of these earlier pieces. But either which way, would you be okay with me showing your stuff to audiences? I&#039;ll throw in any making-of, special thankyous you like, and I&#039;ll send a dvd your way after it&#039;s all done. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Ian. I really like your stuff. I would love to put something into my spring film fest (it doesn&#039;t make any money). Ideality is unfortunately too long and SBFP though in 15 minute intervals is a three parter so that&#039;s too long too. I&#039;ll check out some of these earlier pieces. But either which way, would you be okay with me showing your stuff to audiences? I&#039;ll throw in any making-of, special thankyous you like, and I&#039;ll send a dvd your way after it&#039;s all done. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Hubert</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-47732</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Hubert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 05:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/2007/01/30/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/#comment-47732</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Filipp, Ideality was really the beginning of my developing my &quot;editing habits and theories&quot;, the most important of which is that I now treat each shot as a sentence, let it say what it has to say, then let it go. Anything less is too short, anything more than that is just gratuitous. It&#039;s worked well for me on future projects. 

Sweet was a sweet movie. 

&quot;Ouch! Next time don’t make a movie with a bunch of teenagers talking.&quot;

Haha. Noted.

&quot;To this I do refer&quot;. It&#039;s fun you pointed out that line. One thing a lot of people don&#039;t really get (it&#039;s not their fault) is that the whole dialogue thing was just kinda a fun/joke/nonsensical satirical thing. Just making up random ways of saying stuff. It certainly wasn&#039;t to impress anyone. &quot;Would you wish to engage in lively conversation over a shared meal?&quot; &quot;Normally I would decline your offer-&quot; &quot;Offer? It was a question.&quot; TOTALLY not being serious. I think it&#039;s a fault of the movie that few people really got that/found it amusing. 

Actually, one of the biggest things I like about this movie is that I was able to remove the 6 minutes of pure expositional dialogue between Sword and Alexander and the movie still makes sense.

me Yoda, I too enjoy the demoreel and robot more than Ideality, much of which was notably made 3 years prior. I know exactly what you mean. Although I still try to shy away from hyperbole&#039;s in my criticisms. 

Check out www.spacemenmovie.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Filipp, Ideality was really the beginning of my developing my &#034;editing habits and theories&#034;, the most important of which is that I now treat each shot as a sentence, let it say what it has to say, then let it go. Anything less is too short, anything more than that is just gratuitous. It&#039;s worked well for me on future projects. </p>
<p>Sweet was a sweet movie. </p>
<p>&#034;Ouch! Next time don’t make a movie with a bunch of teenagers talking.&#034;</p>
<p>Haha. Noted.</p>
<p>&#034;To this I do refer&#034;. It&#039;s fun you pointed out that line. One thing a lot of people don&#039;t really get (it&#039;s not their fault) is that the whole dialogue thing was just kinda a fun/joke/nonsensical satirical thing. Just making up random ways of saying stuff. It certainly wasn&#039;t to impress anyone. &#034;Would you wish to engage in lively conversation over a shared meal?&#034; &#034;Normally I would decline your offer-&#034; &#034;Offer? It was a question.&#034; TOTALLY not being serious. I think it&#039;s a fault of the movie that few people really got that/found it amusing. </p>
<p>Actually, one of the biggest things I like about this movie is that I was able to remove the 6 minutes of pure expositional dialogue between Sword and Alexander and the movie still makes sense.</p>
<p>me Yoda, I too enjoy the demoreel and robot more than Ideality, much of which was notably made 3 years prior. I know exactly what you mean. Although I still try to shy away from hyperbole&#039;s in my criticisms. </p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.spacemenmovie.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spacemenmovie.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kidd JMadd</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-47375</link>
		<dc:creator>Kidd JMadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/2007/01/30/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/#comment-47375</guid>
		<description>I gotta give props for putting something out like this. It was a great effort required and I&#039;m sure you picked up  tons of skills along the way. Project was budget constrained, but I enjoyed it and look forward to seeing more. 
I&#039;d say listen to the constructive critics (e.g. filipp) and focus on developing your artistic and technical talents. As for the non-constructive critics, remember that many artists (Bach, Vivaldi, Van Gogh...) were not well received initially but were later vindicated. How many of the all-knowing critics who condemned Stravinsky ever composed anything as beautiful and original as The Rite of Spring? The more you produce &amp; release the better you get and the more other artists may be inspired by your work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta give props for putting something out like this. It was a great effort required and I&#039;m sure you picked up  tons of skills along the way. Project was budget constrained, but I enjoyed it and look forward to seeing more.<br />
I&#039;d say listen to the constructive critics (e.g. filipp) and focus on developing your artistic and technical talents. As for the non-constructive critics, remember that many artists (Bach, Vivaldi, Van Gogh&#8230;) were not well received initially but were later vindicated. How many of the all-knowing critics who condemned Stravinsky ever composed anything as beautiful and original as The Rite of Spring? The more you produce &amp; release the better you get and the more other artists may be inspired by your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filipp</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-46286</link>
		<dc:creator>filipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/2007/01/30/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/#comment-46286</guid>
		<description>The &quot;what is reality&quot; card was first played by Aristotle in around 400 BC, so you have to be a real philosophical and literary genius to squeeze something fresh out of that one.

The main character reminded me of Screech from &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saved_by_the_Bell&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Saved By the Bell&lt;/a&gt;.

I think the editing was mostly relevant, but maybe a tad too fast at times. For example the bridge scene in the first quarter of the show - the far angle is a beautiful shot, but if you cut to it 3 times, it loses its value.

Especially in short films, long cuts really help to make the movie &quot;seem&quot; longer. This was also the problem with ED, IMHO - too many shots and cuts. Take for instance the short film &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ifilm.com/video/701874&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sweet&lt;/a&gt;, it&#039;s only 4 minutes long, yet it feels like a &quot;real&quot; movie and not once are you bored. Notice how few shots there are and that some of them don&#039;t even &quot;make sense&quot; storywise (like the opening cityscape). They&#039;re also very long, considering the total length of the film.

This isn&#039;t even cricism right now, just some ideas for the next time. A great job, especially for your first project! I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll hear great things from Ian in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#034;what is reality&#034; card was first played by Aristotle in around 400 BC, so you have to be a real philosophical and literary genius to squeeze something fresh out of that one.</p>
<p>The main character reminded me of Screech from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saved_by_the_Bell" rel="nofollow">Saved By the Bell</a>.</p>
<p>I think the editing was mostly relevant, but maybe a tad too fast at times. For example the bridge scene in the first quarter of the show &#8211; the far angle is a beautiful shot, but if you cut to it 3 times, it loses its value.</p>
<p>Especially in short films, long cuts really help to make the movie &#034;seem&#034; longer. This was also the problem with ED, IMHO &#8211; too many shots and cuts. Take for instance the short film <a href="http://www.ifilm.com/video/701874" rel="nofollow">Sweet</a>, it&#039;s only 4 minutes long, yet it feels like a &#034;real&#034; movie and not once are you bored. Notice how few shots there are and that some of them don&#039;t even &#034;make sense&#034; storywise (like the opening cityscape). They&#039;re also very long, considering the total length of the film.</p>
<p>This isn&#039;t even cricism right now, just some ideas for the next time. A great job, especially for your first project! I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll hear great things from Ian in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-46003</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/2007/01/30/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/#comment-46003</guid>
		<description>Well done!  Original and interesting.  Rough around the edges, yes.  Lots of subtle and not so subtle visuals that show a truly artistic eye.  The dialog is flat and dry, but in this this setting it works nicely.  Yes, the 3D was nice as well.  

Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done!  Original and interesting.  Rough around the edges, yes.  Lots of subtle and not so subtle visuals that show a truly artistic eye.  The dialog is flat and dry, but in this this setting it works nicely.  Yes, the 3D was nice as well.  </p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dude man</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-45830</link>
		<dc:creator>Dude man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/2007/01/30/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/#comment-45830</guid>
		<description>To the maker of the movie,

Don&#039;t let the criticism bring you down -- for the most part, they are honest and accurate.  I get criticism ALL THE TIME, but I a) dont&#039; let it bother me, and b) learn from them and improve.

This is your first &#039;big&#039; production, and good learning experience.  I&#039;ve had MANY projects, but no CGI. Perhaps I&#039;ll incorporate some CGI in the future, but I need a GOOD STORY, just can&#039;t think of a good story (and I mean a really interesting story - I don&#039;t want to &#039;regurgitate&#039; stuff)....

Anyhow, keep up the good work!

Dude man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the maker of the movie,</p>
<p>Don&#039;t let the criticism bring you down &#8212; for the most part, they are honest and accurate.  I get criticism ALL THE TIME, but I a) dont&#039; let it bother me, and b) learn from them and improve.</p>
<p>This is your first &#039;big&#039; production, and good learning experience.  I&#039;ve had MANY projects, but no CGI. Perhaps I&#039;ll incorporate some CGI in the future, but I need a GOOD STORY, just can&#039;t think of a good story (and I mean a really interesting story &#8211; I don&#039;t want to &#039;regurgitate&#039; stuff)&#8230;.</p>
<p>Anyhow, keep up the good work!</p>
<p>Dude man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grafixsuz</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-45826</link>
		<dc:creator>grafixsuz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/2007/01/30/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/#comment-45826</guid>
		<description>Hahaha, great work man, I must agree with everyone, well done, even if amateur. Loved it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha, great work man, I must agree with everyone, well done, even if amateur. Loved it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roofoo</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-45814</link>
		<dc:creator>roofoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/2007/01/30/blender-in-amateur-movie-%e2%80%9cideality%e2%80%9d/#comment-45814</guid>
		<description>That was kind of freaky when the girl said &quot;I&#039;m a man.&quot; Very confusing.

But I think the effects were done well, I have to agree that the lines in some parts were a bit stilted, but so what? The Star Wars prequels had no better acting than this... I think bad lines will make even a professional actor look dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was kind of freaky when the girl said &#034;I&#039;m a man.&#034; Very confusing.</p>
<p>But I think the effects were done well, I have to agree that the lines in some parts were a bit stilted, but so what? The Star Wars prequels had no better acting than this&#8230; I think bad lines will make even a professional actor look dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
