Advertisement

You're blocking ads, which pay for BlenderNation. Read about other ways to support us.

Model: Beach Scene

16

By BMF.

BMF writes:

My goal with this model was to create a realistic ocean as seen from a typical New England beach. The scene is rendered with the Blender Internal engine and there are no compositing enhancements.

I’m not opposed to compositing as it can add a lot to a rendered scene. However, I like to see how well I can do with just the models, texturing, and lighting. That, and I’m still a novice and so it forces me to focus on getting the scene as close as possible to what I want and relying less on the compositing enhancements.

I’m very satisfied with the way the scene turned out. I could have made the Sea Oats a little more realistic, but I think they are OK for this particular scene.

The two images are copyright free. You are free to use the models however you like. It’s just one of my many hobbies and I don’t feel the need for recognition for anything I create. If you can use anything in the Beach Scene, then embrace them as your own and enjoy.

NOTE: I wanted to make realistic waves as the ocean rolls into the beach. I just couldn’t make it happen. If you find a way to do that, I would appreciate it if you would post a comment with a detailed descriptions of how you did it. Thanks.

Link

About the Author

Avatar image for Bart Veldhuizen
Bart Veldhuizen

I have a LONG history with Blender - I wrote some of the earliest Blender tutorials, worked for Not a Number and helped run the crowdfunding campaign that open sourced Blender (the first one on the internet!). I founded BlenderNation in 2006 and have been editing it every single day since then ;-) I also run the Blender Artists forum and I'm Head of Community at Sketchfab.

16 Comments

    • No, it does not look real, it is better than real: light is the right
      one, shadows are as chosen, composition and DOF present in a way not so
      easy to obtain with a camera.

      I'd like we all forget that burden of "make CG like a real photo". Maybe
      it's useful for making archviz and be (under)paid somehow, but it has
      nothing to do with art, definitely.

      A lot of works made with 3d/maya and Vray, though skillfully done, give plenty of boredom to me.

      • Omitting camera flaws does not make the image look 'better than real'. The image, while not bad, is still below the standards set by reality.

        • Impressionists painters styled themselves as closer to perception of reality than their predecessors. Its for all of us to see that actually they made quite a different thing, and really a very great one, at that.
          There is no "standard reality set", but only one's interprettation of what "reality" is.
          I'll say it again. let us earn our living with archviz, product show and the like(I myself first), but do not fool ourselves that this is art. This is mere technique. Van Gogh was by far less technically skillfull than, say, Alma Tadema, but he was a greater painter indeed. Got the difference?

    • Thanks for the suggestion. I did experiment with dynamic painting, and I can achieve waves that look OK from a distance, but what I was looking for is that moment when waves approach the shore and the crest begins to curl over on itself and then crashes on to the beach. Failure to create that in Blender is the reason I chose not to show the shoreline in the scene. It didn't look convincing.
      I have had a couple of ideas how I might create that scene, but I have a business to run and so I don't have as much time as I'd like to experiment with Blender.

  1. craig hellman on

    I grew up on the shore of Lake Michigan. This is a very accurate and realistic picture, beautiful, too.

  2. a question though I could be wrong here but I think allowing the lighting to have so much influence over the final color is kinda limiting no......I mean sand has a particular color under any but the most extreme lighting situations.........as far as I can tell anyways

    • Be careful. If you don't felate the creator on here, people will be the most obnoxious creatures you have ever seen.

      It's kinda like reverse trolling. You provide constructive feedback, they take it as a personal attack and try to poop in your waffles.

    • I think he was just saying that the scene is just what you'd find everyday on a New England beach. I don't think they were saying that New England beaches are more particular than any other beaches.

  3. Lovely picture (better than anything I could ever do!), but just one thing that detracts - shadows at bottom left look too diffuse compared with the ones on the right. It's like the right of the image was 'shot' at 14:00, and the left was 'shot' at 19:00 as the light faded for the day. I think some litter, footprint, or other human artefact subtly in the shot somewhere might lengthen the "is that real or is it fake?" time when first seeing the image!

Leave A Reply

To add a profile picture to your message, register your email address with Gravatar.com. To protect your email address, create an account on BlenderNation and log in when posting a message.

Advertisement

×