<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blender Benchmark: 2.49 vs 2.50 alpha 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blendernation.com/2010/05/09/blender-benchmark-2-49-vs-2-52a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blendernation.com/2010/05/09/blender-benchmark-2-49-vs-2-52a/</link>
	<description>Fresh Blender News, Every Day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorkimaru</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/2010/05/09/blender-benchmark-2-49-vs-2-52a/#comment-516205</link>
		<dc:creator>Rorkimaru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=12621#comment-516205</guid>
		<description>As long as the final release doesn&#039;t crash mid render like the current alpha does all is well. I know it&#039;s alpha stage so crashes are to be expected but all the lovely new features work for me but I can&#039;t render more than a few frames at HD resolution before a crash.

(this is a 2.5 issue because I can render til the cows come home on 2.49)

Still, can&#039;t wait for the stable version to come out so I can get to work on my webseries =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as the final release doesn&#8217;t crash mid render like the current alpha does all is well. I know it&#8217;s alpha stage so crashes are to be expected but all the lovely new features work for me but I can&#8217;t render more than a few frames at HD resolution before a crash.</p>
<p>(this is a 2.5 issue because I can render til the cows come home on 2.49)</p>
<p>Still, can&#8217;t wait for the stable version to come out so I can get to work on my webseries =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ossassin2</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/2010/05/09/blender-benchmark-2-49-vs-2-52a/#comment-515923</link>
		<dc:creator>ossassin2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 12:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=12621#comment-515923</guid>
		<description>WOW!!!! The difference of render-time is incredible!!!! This is a great news!!!!

8=8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!!! The difference of render-time is incredible!!!! This is a great news!!!!</p>
<p>8=8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reaction</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/2010/05/09/blender-benchmark-2-49-vs-2-52a/#comment-515913</link>
		<dc:creator>Reaction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 11:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=12621#comment-515913</guid>
		<description>For anyone looking at the render times, the difference between 64-bit v. 32-bit is important to mention. 

I normally use a 3.0 GHz Core2Quad, running Windows XP 32.
Recently I got to use a 2.4 GHz Xeon Quad, running Windows XP 64.

Initially, I installed 32-bit Blender on the Xeon and the render was about 0.9x as fast (i.e. slower) than the 32-bit machine, as expected for the clock speed.  I then installed 64-bit Blender on the Xeon. It then rendered at around 3.5x - 4.5x as fast as my 32-bit PC!  So in short, if you have a 64-bit OS then switching to 64-bit Blender can make a huge difference in render times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone looking at the render times, the difference between 64-bit v. 32-bit is important to mention. </p>
<p>I normally use a 3.0 GHz Core2Quad, running Windows XP 32.<br />
Recently I got to use a 2.4 GHz Xeon Quad, running Windows XP 64.</p>
<p>Initially, I installed 32-bit Blender on the Xeon and the render was about 0.9x as fast (i.e. slower) than the 32-bit machine, as expected for the clock speed.  I then installed 64-bit Blender on the Xeon. It then rendered at around 3.5x &#8211; 4.5x as fast as my 32-bit PC!  So in short, if you have a 64-bit OS then switching to 64-bit Blender can make a huge difference in render times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gridlost</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/2010/05/09/blender-benchmark-2-49-vs-2-52a/#comment-515897</link>
		<dc:creator>Gridlost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 03:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=12621#comment-515897</guid>
		<description>I wil be just stoked when 2.5 hits a beta state and has all its features. I&#039;m looking forward to the material library and finally being able to save my own custom GUI. currently not everything saves. colors for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wil be just stoked when 2.5 hits a beta state and has all its features. I&#8217;m looking forward to the material library and finally being able to save my own custom GUI. currently not everything saves. colors for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacob valenta</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/2010/05/09/blender-benchmark-2-49-vs-2-52a/#comment-515890</link>
		<dc:creator>jacob valenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=12621#comment-515890</guid>
		<description>amazing speed up with render times alone! great work being done on blender...

btw i think it may be 2.52 because when they release it, it will just be 2.6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amazing speed up with render times alone! great work being done on blender&#8230;</p>
<p>btw i think it may be 2.52 because when they release it, it will just be 2.6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixnlove</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/2010/05/09/blender-benchmark-2-49-vs-2-52a/#comment-515880</link>
		<dc:creator>pixnlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 12:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=12621#comment-515880</guid>
		<description>I do not know what it is,
but Blender 2.5 does not grow in me,
I find myself going back to 2.49.

Question for Matt:
Will all the Script in 2.49 will be converted to 2.5?
Script such as the edge to curve available under the mesh script.

thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not know what it is,<br />
but Blender 2.5 does not grow in me,<br />
I find myself going back to 2.49.</p>
<p>Question for Matt:<br />
Will all the Script in 2.49 will be converted to 2.5?<br />
Script such as the edge to curve available under the mesh script.</p>
<p>thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elephantatech</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/2010/05/09/blender-benchmark-2-49-vs-2-52a/#comment-515875</link>
		<dc:creator>elephantatech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 09:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=12621#comment-515875</guid>
		<description>yes you are right. It should be Blender 2.5.2 as per the http://www.blender.org/development/release-logs/blender-250/ you will see it on the top. Thanks @Olm-Z for pointing that out. I also updated my post with the correct information. It has just become bad habit of forgetting the period between the 5 and 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes you are right. It should be Blender 2.5.2 as per the <a href="http://www.blender.org/development/release-logs/blender-250/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blender.org/development/release-logs/blender-250/</a> you will see it on the top. Thanks @Olm-Z for pointing that out. I also updated my post with the correct information. It has just become bad habit of forgetting the period between the 5 and 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olm-Z</title>
		<link>http://www.blendernation.com/2010/05/09/blender-benchmark-2-49-vs-2-52a/#comment-515874</link>
		<dc:creator>Olm-Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 09:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blendernation.com/?p=12621#comment-515874</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t it &quot;Blender 2.50 alpha 2&quot; instead of &quot;Blender 2.52 alpha&quot; ???? 
hum ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t it &#8220;Blender 2.50 alpha 2&#8243; instead of &#8220;Blender 2.52 alpha&#8221; ????<br />
hum &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/10 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 398/402 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.blendernation.com @ 2012-02-15 01:08:34 -->
