Blender Physics Development Sprint

blender_logo_cropped.jpgThe Blender Institute Amsterdam will host a "Blender Sprint", meant to speed up and synchronize development of physics code in Blender.

Dates: October 10-11

Participants: Daniel Genrich, Jens Ole Wund, Nils Tuery, Janne Karhu, Campbell Barton, Brecht van Lommel and Ton Roosendaal

Result of the 2-day sprint will be presented and discussed during the Blender Conference as well.

Get more info…



Related Posts


Related posts are selected automatically based on their content.


26 Responses to “Blender Physics Development Sprint”  

  1. 1 frozerino Edit Link

    This sounds so great!
    Those guys are crazy, and i like it :p

    go go blender physics development go!

  2. 2 Vassilios Boucer Edit Link

    Ohhhhh…my…G..!!!Thats Amazing!!!
    ofcourse ……..very good news!!
    go Blender GOoooooo!

  3. 3 tedi Edit Link

    Cool.

    would be way cooler if __someday__ Blender gets direct access to physics-dynamics in "standard" view (i.e. directly renderable) and hooked via python.

    like

    from Blender import Physics
    # or bpy … whatever
    # …
    # …
    myob.phyprop.Set(SOME, SOMEMORE)
    yourob.phyprop.Set(EVENMORE, TOOMUCH)
    Blender.Physics.enable(myob, yourob)
    Blender.Physics.Go(startframe, endframe)

    Blender.Crash(' ;) ')

  4. 4 Sergeant Oreo Edit Link

    Wow! This sounds so cool!
    I hope everything goes well.

    "go go blender physics development go!"

  5. 5 tikki Edit Link

    yay. i hope the fluid simulation (is that concidered physics? pretty sure it is) get a whole lot faster.
    go go blender physics development go!

  6. 6 Shadowman99 Edit Link

    I hope they discuss combustion physics and effects while they're at it. There's not a really great way to create fire within Blender, but it's relatively common in commercial software.

  7. 7 kram1032 Edit Link

    Yay ;D
    I love the current blender physics, but I know, it could be FAR better :D
    Are two days not a tiny bit short?

  8. 8 MonkeysTail Edit Link

    Hmmm…
    Perhaps we could look into OGRE? I'm not saying to steal from the project…

    Just… umm… be inspired by it. ;)

  9. 9 Kernon Edit Link

    @kram1032
    not when the master coders are convening :).

  10. 10 epat Edit Link

    lol - I'm gonna be interested to see the outcome of this, I heard about it a while ago! It might really improve the physics capabilities of Blender - or on the other hand, it might mean a whole new lot of grotty, rushed, code that needs a whole new lot of maintaining. I vote for option A, but it'll be interesting…
    ~epat. :)

  11. 11 Matt Edit Link

    epat: It's more about getting the existing blender devs who are working in the area of physical simulation together for a couple of days to discuss how to make things work better, interoperate, integrate, and come up with a unified plan forward. I wouldn't expect that too much would be coded over those days, more like a big brainstorming/planning session.

  12. 12 OBI_Ron Edit Link

    How are we ever going to be able to stop saying Thanks for all of efforts!!!

  13. 13 mfoxdogg Edit Link

    follow this link to see what will be discussed

    http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-committers/2007-October/019484.html

  14. 14 Tynach Edit Link

    Cool, some REAL units in Blender! AND, improved physics and UI! I hope to see all this in test builds and, of course, 2.50!

  15. 15 mmph! Edit Link

    AWESOME!!!

    Everyone please start the chant!!

    RAGDOLL ragdoll RAGDOLL ragdoll RAGDOLL ragdoll RAGDOLL ragdoll!

  16. 16 Aussiedude Edit Link

    My main biff with the physics in Blender. Everything we need is there but it's just all over the place. Theres no connection between everything. Really the water sim, particles, physics engines and everything else should all work together as one solid component, not as little extras here and there. There is a physics area in the buttons window, everything we need should be there. It should be in one little spot and when we have set up all the physics items in the scene setup there should be 1(ONE!) Bake button to bake and calculate and do all of the physics together as one solid simulation…… in a perfect world.

    Of course also the US should spend more money improving there health and education system instead of going into space, nuclear weapons should be banned, a zero tolerance anti-pollution policy for corporations and all wars put to an end….. in a perfect world.

    I make the comparison because combining and reorganising the physics tools in Blender would be a major task, it would involve rewriting most of the code, it would also require that all the coders work VERY closely with each other, instead of the current situation where each little physics thing is handling almost completely separate to others. It wouldn't be an easy task and I think we'll see Blender 3.00 before it happens. Although it must be done because unless it is the task will just get larger and larger and soon a complete mess which no-one can solve, not even the original coders - god forbid we lose them, if we do then no one will even know where to begin in fixing the code.

    ……So YAY Blender!
    GO GO "Blender Physics Development Sprint" and all those awesome coders! DO your thang you little sexy coders you!

    @mmph: I could of sworn that I saw an example of ragdoll done in previous versions of blender. Although I think like most of the physics in Blender…. it needs… improvement.

  17. 17 Spamagnet Edit Link

    @Aussiedude … in a perfect world, we'd have enough money for health, education *and* a trip to Mars :-)

  18. 18 Brian Edit Link

    Yeah. A unified physics would be my biggest wish from all this.

  19. 19 RNS Edit Link

    great! more fire power to blender!!!!!

  20. 20 kram1032 Edit Link

    unified physics. Does that also mean stuff like air-furniture, swimming on water?
    or what about a:

    quicksilver with floating metals on it
    water
    oil
    and different stuff, that's between water and oil, to create different layers of floating effects

    -simulation? :)

    Or a piece of cloth, that is floating on the water's surface, but then, it sucks the water and starts to "fall" :D
    (softbody + fluid)

    also interesting - slime… somewhere in between softbodies and fluid sim :D

  21. 21 aws357 Edit Link

    I guess that the fact that they need every aspect of physics to work together in an animation played a big role in this sprint…

    Unified physics. Yum

  22. 22 TheDreamer Edit Link

    Maybe Blender's physics will be like Crytek. Lol. Unreal can't even touch that stuff. I love just about everything Blender 3D, it never ceases to amaze me. I'll be happy with a 'Doze version of Magic Fluids, even just a Magic puddle…lol.

  23. 23 epat Edit Link

    @Matt:
    I see what you mean - well, it would make sense, but somehow, I can't help thinking that some code might get written - after all, you know coders/coding… ;) and the title, 'Physics Sprint', doesn't exactly sound like sitting around with a coffee… We'll see I suppose, but I'm guessing that the eventual outcome will be good, whatever they do inbetween!…
    ~epat. ;)

  24. 24 David Revoy ( Deevad ) Edit Link

    good luck to all the 'sprint' team, I 'm sure amazing feature will be created.

  25. 25 rIO.sK Edit Link

    Two words : FOAM and NETWORK BAKING.
    The speed of the fluid simulator is not that far from commercial software but it whould be cool to distribute the baking process, and a great addon for the fluids part whould be to add foam.

    Just my 2 cents : why not use a real fluid solver (or a faked one) to create fluid, gases and flames ? The principle is quite similar.

  26. 26 kram1032 Edit Link

    @rIO.sk: did you try to get foam with the particle fluid-ting?
    there, you can set "foam" "splash" and "tracer" as shown ;)
    and very hi reses also give very small droplets, that could be counted as "foam" ;)

Tip: register on gravatar.com to show your own avatar with your comments instead of

Leave a Reply